EIDA Test Report

EIDA Availability Report

Created at 30-08-2025 00:32

This document contains results of automated tests of the waveform availability of European EIDA stations and the responsiveness of the EIDA servers to metadata requests.

Description of waveform test program

Availability test of EIDA stations using Python obspy library.

Conducts random waveform requests to single channels of EIDA stations.
One request per minute.
Requested time span randomly selected from last year, span length between 60 and 600 s.
Station randomly selected from the subset of unrestricted European EIDA stations offering at least one out of channels HHZ, BHZ, EHZ or SHZ.
Request full station metadata from selected station and choose channel randomly, restricted to channels HH?, BH?, EH? and SH?.
On successful request apply a restitution to the waveform data.
Evaluate and store result of request in a file database.
Plot and statistically analyze content of file database.

The code does not use the waveform catalog, therefore empty waveform returns are due to data gaps or due to problems in data access and delivery.

Statistics on waveform tests

Statistics on random requests between 30-05-2025 and 30-08-2025 00:32 using station metadata valid since 30-08-2024.

Counters:

unrestricted stations offering channels HHZ,BHZ,EHZ,SHZ: 3361
evaluated stations: 3239
number of requests: 122467

Waveform availability plot

Color coded plot of evaluated EIDA stations. Shows results of 122467 random requests between 30-05-2025 and 30-08-2025. The availability displayed is computed as the relative number of request results with status OK (see table below) compared to the number of all requests to this station.

EIDA waveform response statistics (250830)

Availability of stations: green 100%, yellow 50%, red 0%

Request status statistics of networks:

net OK OK in % NODATA FRAGMENT INCOMPL METAFAIL NOSERV RESTFAIL

1I 2D 2I 3D 3Q 4P 4R 5B 7B 7C 7F 8D 8N 9L 9S AB AC AM BE BN BQ BS BW C4 CA CH CL CP CQ CR CZ DK DZ EB EE EI ES FN FO FR GB GE GO GQ

net	`OK`	`OK in %`	`NODATA`	`FRAGMENT`	`INCOMPL`	`METAFAIL`	`NOSERV`	`RESTFAIL`
1I 2D 2I 3D 3Q 4P 4R 5B 7B 7C 7F 8D 8N 9L 9S AB AC AM BE BN BQ BS BW C4 CA CH CL CP CQ CR CZ DK DZ EB EE EI ES FN FO FR GB GE GO GQ	`93 124 136 107 133 469 0 38 481 4 102 38 135 14 40 0 320 0 1150 231 387 674 1728 92 791 3335 478 0 394 199 748 385 0 53 217 329 185 301 85 6796 2171 2429 0 186`	`69 70 62 48 84 75 0 84 44 4 87 92 80 32 44 0 73 0 93 61 85 62 76 73 81 87 76 0 52 34 81 27 0 96 92 84 82 76 56 86 89 68 0 75`	`37 49 59 97 7 78 28 4 550 74 3 0 25 29 45 136 78 21 38 125 31 317 465 30 118 279 127 72 329 354 128 953 46 0 15 43 31 82 58 755 133 990 217 30`	`0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 4 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 11 71 0 0 11 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 6 21 5 0 5`	`0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 4 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`4 3 24 14 18 62 1 3 31 3 6 1 6 0 5 0 37 0 43 12 35 82 76 4 55 133 15 2 20 19 33 39 2 2 3 17 5 12 7 274 89 107 11 25`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`

Request status statistics of networks (continued):

net OK OK in % NODATA FRAGMENT INCOMPL METAFAIL NOSERV RESTFAIL

GR GU GX HA HC HE HF HL HP HS HT HU IP IS IV IX IY JS K3 KO KQ LC LE LU LX M1 MD ME MK ML MN MT NH NI NL NO NR NS OE OT OX PL PM QE

net	`OK`	`OK in %`	`NODATA`	`FRAGMENT`	`INCOMPL`	`METAFAIL`	`NOSERV`	`RESTFAIL`
GR GU GX HA HC HE HF HL HP HS HT HU IP IS IV IX IY JS K3 KO KQ LC LE LU LX M1 MD ME MK ML MN MT NH NI NL NO NR NS OE OT OX PL PM QE	`2949 978 76 1104 340 653 0 1744 751 484 1708 502 0 0 12735 315 254 0 1 3907 173 0 1195 404 102 224 108 2 412 76 708 336 18 152 9396 3530 31 1667 851 462 485 294 33 280`	`76 77 90 85 56 75 0 68 86 81 75 87 0 0 72 57 46 0 8 59 51 0 84 86 75 60 84 5 96 85 66 79 3 69 81 90 9 42 77 73 64 91 12 71`	`401 208 4 118 226 197 31 595 25 42 427 60 87 1501 3341 178 260 210 8 575 96 42 115 45 27 131 10 37 1 8 298 79 418 50 1639 166 276 2065 189 83 187 19 220 98`	`0 10 1 0 5 0 0 118 64 3 9 0 0 0 206 10 5 0 0 1306 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 0 0 119 6 0 1 0 2 6 0 0 0`	`2 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 39 2 1 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 5 1 0 15 1 2 0 0 3`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`504 59 3 65 32 20 1 92 28 67 108 12 3 58 1098 43 26 3 3 738 37 0 105 16 4 18 10 1 15 5 55 8 95 18 322 187 6 176 37 38 69 9 4 11`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0`

Request status statistics of networks (continued):

net OK OK in % NODATA FRAGMENT INCOMPL METAFAIL NOSERV RESTFAIL

QM RD RF RN RO SI SJ SK SL SS ST SX TH TQ TT TU TV UD UP UR UT VI VM WE WM XE XP Y8 YD YV ZO

net	`OK`	`OK in %`	`NODATA`	`FRAGMENT`	`INCOMPL`	`METAFAIL`	`NOSERV`	`RESTFAIL`
QM RD RF RN RO SI SJ SK SL SS ST SX TH TQ TT TU TV UD UP UR UT VI VM WE WM XE XP Y8 YD YV ZO	`194 479 45 234 3671 155 341 183 955 34 259 594 1266 248 0 101 16 99 392 281 118 131 42 0 101 352 1323 207 45 89 305`	`64 91 95 49 76 67 57 44 77 80 89 65 79 54 0 22 57 38 89 73 74 64 85 0 41 83 90 80 5 60 84`	`95 24 2 159 768 47 224 213 222 6 4 211 131 183 127 326 7 141 29 92 25 70 0 42 133 51 104 33 271 51 33`	`0 0 0 7 7 0 11 1 5 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1`	`0 1 0 9 5 0 2 1 11 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`12 18 0 62 333 27 19 11 33 2 26 103 192 11 2 15 5 11 16 3 15 2 7 2 7 19 42 17 469 7 22`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`

Status codes used in above statistics:

OK: data delivery and restitution successful
OK in %: Percentage of successful data delivery
NODATA: no data available
FRAGMENT: returned data not contigous
INCOMPL: returned time interval less than requested
METAFAIL: restituted data contain illegal values (Nans)
NOSERV: station metadata request failed
RESTFAIL: removing response failed

Waveform requests, random hit distribution

How many stations have how many hits of random requests.

Request hit statistics showing the distribution of the 122467 requests on the 3239 evaluated stations

Failure rate of inventory requests

This section contains results of inventory test requests on network, station and channel level. A few times per hour all servers get direct metadata requests followed by a metadata request using the routing client of obspy. It is checked whether all servers respond to the direct requests and whether all servers contribute to the routed request. The following results refer to tests carried out since 02-08-2025 00:32:02.

totals: direct requests 2014, routed requests 2014, federator requests 2014

Number of failed requests and failure rates of servers:

server	direct	routed	federator
AFAD	2014 (100.0%)	2000 (100.0%)	1955 (100.0%)
BGR	82 ( 4.1%)	127 ( 6.3%)	170 ( 8.7%)
BGS	2 ( 0.1%)	4 ( 0.2%)	561 (28.7%)
ETH	5 ( 0.2%)	6 ( 0.3%)	82 ( 4.2%)
GFZ	0 ( 0.0%)	2 ( 0.1%)	441 (22.6%)
ICGC	22 ( 1.1%)	22 ( 1.1%)	119 ( 6.1%)
INGV	59 ( 2.9%)	91 ( 4.5%)	142 ( 7.3%)
KOERI	216 (10.7%)	315 (15.8%)	300 (15.3%)
LMU	0 ( 0.0%)	2 ( 0.1%)	86 ( 4.4%)
NIEP	12 ( 0.6%)	16 ( 0.8%)	97 ( 5.0%)
NOA	19 ( 0.9%)	6 ( 0.3%)	83 ( 4.2%)
ODC	0 ( 0.0%)	3 ( 0.1%)	1955 (100.0%)
RESIF	6 ( 0.3%)	3 ( 0.1%)	69 ( 3.5%)
UIB/NORSAR	1 ( 0.0%)	1 ( 0.1%)	86 ( 4.4%)

failures of routing client: 14

failures of federator: 59

runs without errors: 0 (0.0%)

Responsiveness of all servers plotted with a granularity of 8h; green = 0% errors, orange = 10%, brown = 50%, black = 100%

Remarks

A history of these daily reports (in pdf format)as well as request logs on station level are available at ftp://www.szgrf.bgr.de/pub/EidaAvailability,files history_eida_availability_reports.tgz and stationlogs_eida_availability.tgz, respectively. Reports created after 15-08-2022 are available at https://www.szgrf.bgr.de/eidaqc_report/EidaAvailability

This report was automatically created at 30-08-2025 00:32 MEST usingpandoc 2.18.