EIDA Test Report

EIDA Availability Report

Created at 31-12-2025 00:32

This document contains results of automated tests of the waveform availability of European EIDA stations and the responsiveness of the EIDA servers to metadata requests.

Description of waveform test program

Availability test of EIDA stations using Python obspy library.

Conducts random waveform requests to single channels of EIDA stations.
One request per minute.
Requested time span randomly selected from last year, span length between 60 and 600 s.
Station randomly selected from the subset of unrestricted European EIDA stations offering at least one out of channels HHZ, BHZ, EHZ or SHZ.
Request full station metadata from selected station and choose channel randomly, restricted to channels HH?, BH?, EH? and SH?.
On successful request apply a restitution to the waveform data.
Evaluate and store result of request in a file database.
Plot and statistically analyze content of file database.

The code does not use the waveform catalog, therefore empty waveform returns are due to data gaps or due to problems in data access and delivery.

Statistics on waveform tests

Statistics on random requests between 30-09-2025 and 31-12-2025 00:32 using station metadata valid since 31-12-2024.

Counters:

unrestricted stations offering channels HHZ,BHZ,EHZ,SHZ: 3348
evaluated stations: 3246
number of requests: 125342

Waveform availability plot

Color coded plot of evaluated EIDA stations. Shows results of 125342 random requests between 30-09-2025 and 31-12-2025. The availability displayed is computed as the relative number of request results with status OK (see table below) compared to the number of all requests to this station.

EIDA waveform response statistics (251231)

Availability of stations: green 100%, yellow 50%, red 0%

Request status statistics of networks:

net OK OK in % NODATA FRAGMENT INCOMPL METAFAIL NOSERV RESTFAIL

1D 1I 2D 2I 3D 4P 5A 5B 5R 7B 7C 7F 8D 8N 9L 9S AB AC BE BN BQ BS BW C4 CA CH CL CP CQ CR CZ DK DY DZ EB EE EI ES FN FO FR GB GE GO

net	`OK`	`OK in %`	`NODATA`	`FRAGMENT`	`INCOMPL`	`METAFAIL`	`NOSERV`	`RESTFAIL`
1D 1I 2D 2I 3D 4P 5A 5B 5R 7B 7C 7F 8D 8N 9L 9S AB AC BE BN BQ BS BW C4 CA CH CL CP CQ CR CZ DK DY DZ EB EE EI ES FN FO FR GB GE GO	`76 67 198 233 78 436 1 35 104 580 0 121 41 71 32 52 0 441 1273 216 407 713 1844 86 844 3427 579 0 439 501 663 560 53 0 41 203 393 159 405 119 7619 2130 2509 0`	`83 63 83 86 35 60 50 100 61 53 0 96 97 55 64 55 0 92 94 64 87 64 78 69 85 91 91 0 55 39 83 41 33 0 100 83 91 77 98 84 96 93 72 0`	`15 38 40 36 144 262 0 0 66 506 132 4 0 56 18 42 131 33 67 111 40 374 507 38 118 236 54 101 342 763 127 794 106 45 0 39 37 42 5 22 265 104 951 252`	`0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 12 0 0 19 93 0 0 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 7 20 3 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 6 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 8 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 16 2 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`

Request status statistics of networks (continued):

net OK OK in % NODATA FRAGMENT INCOMPL METAFAIL NOSERV RESTFAIL

GQ GR GU GX HA HC HE HF HL HP HS HT HU IP IS IV IX IY JS K3 KO KQ LC LE LU LX M1 MD ME MK ML MN MT NH NI NL NO NR NS OE OT OX PL PM

net	`OK`	`OK in %`	`NODATA`	`FRAGMENT`	`INCOMPL`	`METAFAIL`	`NOSERV`	`RESTFAIL`
GQ GR GU GX HA HC HE HF HL HP HS HT HU IP IS IV IX IY JS K3 KO KQ LC LE LU LX M1 MD ME MK ML MN MT NH NI NL NO NR NS OE OT OX PL PM	`167 3375 1068 84 1211 363 683 0 1933 811 523 1804 552 0 0 14448 403 439 0 20 4383 231 0 1403 447 79 279 116 26 367 70 750 349 248 150 9674 3425 30 1614 858 547 494 341 37`	`84 86 80 84 91 60 78 0 74 93 88 80 85 0 0 79 65 59 0 80 62 66 0 89 94 64 67 89 55 99 83 66 83 50 69 87 88 10 42 78 80 69 99 15`	`24 481 238 13 107 228 185 47 612 36 68 425 92 88 1600 3501 198 286 215 5 759 54 41 106 26 42 133 14 21 1 14 360 68 224 64 1249 195 243 1956 216 89 210 3 202`	`4 1 18 2 0 3 0 0 48 19 2 11 0 0 0 202 11 6 0 0 1706 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 2 2 123 8 0 1 0 7 3 0 0`	`0 4 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 5 1 0 0 28 3 1 0 0 52 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 21 7 0 0 21 2 1 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`2 43 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 6 0 0 91 7 0 59 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 2 252 0 266 0 0 2 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 0 0 0`

Request status statistics of networks (continued):

net OK OK in % NODATA FRAGMENT INCOMPL METAFAIL NOSERV RESTFAIL

QE QM RD RF RN RO SI SJ SK SL SS ST SX TH TQ TT TU TV UD UP UR UT VI VM WE WM XE XP Y8 YD YV ZO

net	`OK`	`OK in %`	`NODATA`	`FRAGMENT`	`INCOMPL`	`METAFAIL`	`NOSERV`	`RESTFAIL`
QE QM RD RF RN RO SI SJ SK SL SS ST SX TH TQ TT TU TV UD UP UR UT VI VM WE WM XE XP Y8 YD YV ZO	`230 258 507 39 214 4092 142 434 238 1069 32 347 636 1392 204 0 110 24 87 425 252 197 228 49 0 108 226 1474 159 10 102 313`	`58 73 98 100 48 81 54 74 50 83 84 99 72 90 52 0 23 55 31 94 70 93 79 100 0 48 59 99 80 1 57 91`	`139 95 4 0 204 889 117 141 237 192 6 1 229 127 178 138 361 19 182 22 99 13 56 0 36 113 153 5 39 102 75 28`	`1 0 0 0 4 7 0 3 0 5 0 0 1 3 9 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`0 0 2 0 16 10 0 3 0 18 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`	`22 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 690 0 0`	`0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0`

Status codes used in above statistics:

OK: data delivery and restitution successful
OK in %: Percentage of successful data delivery
NODATA: no data available
FRAGMENT: returned data not contigous
INCOMPL: returned time interval less than requested
METAFAIL: restituted data contain illegal values (Nans)
NOSERV: station metadata request failed
RESTFAIL: removing response failed

Waveform requests, random hit distribution

How many stations have how many hits of random requests.

Request hit statistics showing the distribution of the 125342 requests on the 3246 evaluated stations

Failure rate of inventory requests

This section contains results of inventory test requests on network, station and channel level. A few times per hour all servers get direct metadata requests followed by a metadata request using the routing client of obspy. It is checked whether all servers respond to the direct requests and whether all servers contribute to the routed request. The following results refer to tests carried out since 03-12-2025 00:32:02.

totals: direct requests 2015, routed requests 2015, federator requests 2015

Number of failed requests and failure rates of servers:

server	direct	routed	federator
AFAD	2015 (100.0%)	2015 (100.0%)	1960 (100.0%)
BGR	12 ( 0.6%)	19 ( 0.9%)	35 ( 1.8%)
BGS	2 ( 0.1%)	2 ( 0.1%)	7 ( 0.4%)
ETH	0 ( 0.0%)	1 ( 0.0%)	3 ( 0.2%)
GFZ	0 ( 0.0%)	0 ( 0.0%)	318 (16.2%)
ICGC	3 ( 0.1%)	1 ( 0.0%)	18 ( 0.9%)
INGV	3 ( 0.1%)	0 ( 0.0%)	21 ( 1.1%)
KOERI	17 ( 0.8%)	80 ( 4.0%)	11 ( 0.6%)
LMU	3 ( 0.1%)	2 ( 0.1%)	7 ( 0.4%)
NIEP	10 ( 0.5%)	8 ( 0.4%)	18 ( 0.9%)
NOA	5 ( 0.2%)	2 ( 0.1%)	16 ( 0.8%)
ODC	0 ( 0.0%)	0 ( 0.0%)	80 ( 4.1%)
RESIF	2 ( 0.1%)	2 ( 0.1%)	16 ( 0.8%)
UIB/NORSAR	96 ( 4.8%)	319 (15.8%)	53 ( 2.7%)

failures of routing client: 0

failures of federator: 55

runs without errors: 0 (0.0%)

Responsiveness of all servers plotted with a granularity of 8h; green = 0% errors, orange = 10%, brown = 50%, black = 100%

Remarks

A history of these daily reports (in pdf format)as well as request logs on station level are available at ftp://www.szgrf.bgr.de/pub/EidaAvailability,files history_eida_availability_reports.tgz and stationlogs_eida_availability.tgz, respectively. Reports created after 15-08-2022 are available at https://www.szgrf.bgr.de/eidaqc_report/EidaAvailability

This report was automatically created at 31-12-2025 00:32 MEST usingpandoc 2.18.